CASE STUDIES · 04

Case studies

How we’ve helped blockchain security firms and DeFi protocols grow their pipeline, sales and audience.

Code4rena logoCode4rena Blockchain security
$2.3M GMV from pipeline we sourced Data-driven sales for a crowded audit market. →
Bunni logoBunni DeFi liquidity
$21M peak TVL, up from under $10M Growing liquidity through partnerships. →
Flash logoFlash Perpetuals DEX
+96% impressions on X in the first month Memes that nearly doubled Flash’s reach on X. →
Hyacinth logoHyacinth Blockchain security
$486K closed revenue from net-new pipeline Pipeline and audience, built from zero. →
← All case studies Code4rena logoCode4rena

Data-driven sales for a crowded audit market.

COMPANY
Code4rena, a competitive audit platform
ROLE
Sales and BD
TEAM
Triad sales team
REGION
APAC, with a focus on the India market
$2.3M GMV from pipeline we sourced
3 new ecosystems: StarkNet, Aptos and Solana
1st Bug Bounty partner, sourced by us
01 · CHALLENGE

A strong brand in a crowded market, with a bear market stretching sales cycles and clients drifting to other firms.

From the start, we viewed Code4rena as a dominant player in the auditing sector, having audited numerous top-tier protocols. Our marketing and brand awareness were strong, but the competition in auditing was fierce. Traditional auditors like Consensys Diligence and Trail of Bits were well established, and other platforms like Sherlock were going after the same protocols.

The market made sales slower too. In the bear market, protocols became more cautious about audit budgets and some even delayed launches, which led to longer sales cycles as decision makers looked for cost-effective options. Retention wasn’t as good as it should be either, and some protocols we had audited switched to different firms.

And we were building regional mindshare from the ground up.

02 · WHAT WE DID

We sourced pipeline for our triad sales team through account research, data-driven outbound and upsell tracking. For outbound, we used signals like GitHub activity and funding triggers to find protocols that were likely to need an audit. That pipeline fed into $2.3M in GMV.

When we talked with protocols that had gone with traditional auditors, we took the narrative that those firms are great for consulting work and early codebase security, but to make the codebase as bulletproof as possible before launch, audit contests find way more critical bugs. That was our value proposition.

We also tried a consultative approach, becoming navigators instead of a team that just wanted to close the deal. We invested a lot of time in understanding each person we connected with, and those relationships ended up sending referrals our way.

We built regional mindshare from the ground up, with a focus on the India market.

We analysed client behavioural patterns, security posture and competitor audit models to improve follow-up predictability, refine our sales approach and feed platform strategy.

CLIENT BEHAVIOURAL PATTERNS

Our ideal clients need security audits at specific intervals, like once every two or four quarters. So we lined up follow-ups with those cycles, reached out before their audit schedule and even asked clients to book audits in advance, to make follow-ups more predictable.

We also put together a retention and churn report on Code4rena’s public audits. Out of 69 projects, only 9 came back for another audit, a retention rate of 13.04%. Based on that, we recommended a post-audit feedback loop, regular retention touches with past clients, exit discussions with clients who didn’t return and using the data to spot upsell and cross-sell opportunities.

SECURITY POSTURE

We looked at each protocol’s security posture to refine our sales approach. Top protocols that are resilient to the bear market can afford multiple audits. Early-stage protocols are more risk-averse. They want to make the best of each penny in their audit budget, might only work with one auditor at the start and take much more convincing to convert.

COMPETITOR AUDIT MODELS

We analysed competitor audit models (open, invitational and hybrid) to feed into platform strategy. Alongside that, we shared client feedback with the team, covering findings curation, pricing and how much of the audit cost actually goes into finding bugs. We also wrote a breakdown of why warden activity might be declining, with ideas for keeping top wardens around.

We played a key role in launching the Bug Bounty Program by sourcing the first partner. We secured Dinero (acquired by Plume), which remained the program’s largest bounty until the program wound down.

We expanded into emerging ecosystems as net-new verticals for the company: StarkNet (Cairo), Aptos (Move) and Solana (Rust). On StarkNet, we sourced the first Cairo audit client and unlocked a Starknet Foundation partnership for subsidised audits for early-stage protocols.

We’d also written about this in our notes on C4’s sales, where we suggested ecosystem-level partnerships and expanding into chains like Aptos and Solana, since we had good relations with some of these ecosystems.

03 · RESULTS
RETENTION ON PUBLIC AUDITS · ONE DOT PER PROJECT
9 of 69 projects came back for another audit, a retention rate of 13.04%
NEW ECOSYSTEMS
StarkNet Cairo
Aptos Move
Solana Rust
First Cairo audit client sourced on StarkNet, plus a Starknet Foundation partnership for subsidised audits.
04 · TAKEAWAYS
  1. 01 Retaining existing clients is often more cost-effective than acquiring new ones. Building and maintaining solid relationships with clients and partners leads to more retention and sets the stage for word of mouth.
  2. 02 Clients need audits at specific intervals, so the sales approach and follow-ups should line up with those timelines.
  3. 03 Relationships with key decision makers matter even more in auditing sales, and leveraging existing ones for referrals and intros is just as important. Trust is invaluable.
  4. 04 Feedback from both clients and wardens is worth collecting regularly, because that data helps you make informed decisions later on.
NEXT CASE STUDY · Bunni Growing liquidity through partnerships. →
← All case studies Bunni logoBunni

Growing liquidity through partnerships.

COMPANY
Bunni, a liquidity protocol by Timeless
ROLE
Business development and ecosystem partnerships
FOCUS
Liquidity growth, LP profitability, integrations and grants
BUILT ON
Uniswap v3 (V1) and Uniswap v4 (V2)
$21M peak TVL, up from under $10M
20+ LST/LRT protocol integrations
$150K+ in grants from Uniswap and the Arbitrum Foundation
01 · CHALLENGE

LPs needed liquidity that stayed profitable, and Bunni needed the partners, integrations and grants to supply it.

Providing liquidity in DeFi is hard to keep profitable across market conditions. LPs deal with impermanent loss and swings in trading volume, while protocols need deeper liquidity without relying on token emissions forever.

Bunni set out to make liquidity provision more profitable and capital efficient. A strong product was only part of it. Bunni also needed LPs, integrations with protocols whose tokens needed liquidity, ecosystem partners and resources to keep growing.

Our focus was building those relationships and finding where Bunni’s liquidity infrastructure could create value for both partners and LPs.

02 · WHAT WE DID

We co-led business development for Bunni, focusing on liquid staking (LST) and liquid restaking (LRT) protocols. These teams needed deep, efficient liquidity for their tokens, and Bunni was built to provide it.

We facilitated integrations with 20+ LST/LRT protocols and secured partnerships with EtherFi, Frax, Dinero, Rocket Pool and Gravita.

Each partnership worked both ways. Partners got better liquidity for their tokens, and Bunni got more supported assets, more users and more liquidity.

Our BD work tied back to Bunni’s core pitch: better economics for LPs in any market. We didn’t treat partnerships as standalone integrations. Each one was a way to bring in liquidity that would stay.

In practice, that meant finding complementary protocols, understanding what liquidity they needed and matching them with what Bunni’s product could do.

This helped grow Bunni’s TVL from under $10M to a peak of $21.08M in June 2023.

We secured over $150K in grants from Uniswap and the Arbitrum Foundation to support Bunni’s growth and ecosystem work.

Our governance and delegate experience made a real difference here. Knowing how these ecosystems make decisions, and what their stakeholders care about, helped us navigate grant discussions and build the right relationships. We approached grants as a way to line up Bunni’s goals with each ecosystem’s goals, not just as funding.

Beyond individual integrations, we built relationships across the wider DeFi ecosystem. This meant understanding each protocol’s priorities, finding where they lined up with Bunni’s and turning that into integrations, distribution and funding.

Our governance background helped here too. We knew how ecosystem decisions get made and how to pitch Bunni to stakeholders beyond its own users.

We also managed Bunni’s Twitter presence, creating posts and drafting content around yield opportunities, LP profitability and the protocol’s broader value proposition. Alongside educational and product focused content, we used humour-led, crypto-native content to engage the DeFi community and keep Bunni part of the ongoing conversation across the ecosystem.

This complemented our BD efforts by helping communicate Bunni’s value proposition, maintain community mindshare and support the protocol’s broader ecosystem presence.

03 · RESULTS

Bunni V1 results from our BD and partnerships work, and where Bunni V2 went later.

BUNNI V1 · TVL
Before<$10M
Peak, June 2023$21.08M
Grants from Uniswap and the Arbitrum Foundation $150K+
20+ LST/LRT INTEGRATIONS · PARTNERSHIPS
EtherFi Frax Dinero Rocket Pool Gravita +15 more

Partners got better liquidity for their tokens, and Bunni got more supported assets, more users and more liquidity.

LATER · BUNNI V2
$70.8Mpeak TVL
$517K+fees generated
~$2.5Bvolume processed
NEXT CASE STUDY · Flash Memes that nearly doubled Flash’s reach on X. →
← All case studies Flash logoFlash

Memes that nearly doubled Flash’s reach on X.

COMPANY
Flash
ROLE
X content, memes and community engagement
TIMELINE
June 2025 onwards, full takeover from August 2025
CHANNEL
X (Crypto Twitter)
+96% impressions in the first month of full takeover
+99% profile visits
+146% replies
01 · CHALLENGE

Flash needed a bigger presence on Twitter, a simpler way to explain futarchy, and weekly rewards that kept reaching new people.

When we started in June 2025, there was an opportunity to build a stronger presence on Twitter through memes and humorous content. Futarchy was also still new to many users, and the weekly staking rewards needed a way to keep reaching more people.

The goal was to make Flash more visible on Twitter, communicate product updates in a way that resonated with its audience, and keep the community engaged beyond announcements.

02 · WHAT WE DID

We started by creating memes and humorous posts to build attention on Twitter. The focus was on creating content that felt native to the ecosystem, gave people something to engage with, and helped Flash participate in conversations beyond its own product updates.

Instead of treating announcements as standalone updates, we experimented with humour-led creative to make them more engaging. We also used AI-generated images and videos featuring Flash’s internal character, Tenzy, to create visuals for different announcements.

Flash was among the early protocols experimenting with futarchy, before the MetaDAO raise era brought the concept wider attention. Many users were still unfamiliar with how futarchy differed from conventional governance, and even some of Flash’s power users were confused when the first proposal was coming up.

To make the concept easier to understand, we created a fast-paced, TikTok-style video using a popular cartoon format to explain futarchy in simpler terms.

The video received more engagement than the initial proposal announcement, showing how familiar content formats could help communicate a relatively complex concept.

Every week, Flash distributed 2M FAF to stakers. Instead of posting the same type of reward announcement every time, we used trending memes and humorous posts to spread awareness of the rewards and highlight new APY updates on Flash pools, reaching more active DeFi users across the ecosystem.

When memecoins were rallying, the Meme Pool’s APY reached five digits for a few days, yet the pool still had 40% capacity remaining. We posted humorous content about it, and soon after, the pool reached full capacity, with more users wanting to deposit.

We actively engaged with major accounts, popular Solana protocols and Solana influencers through replies, most of them lighthearted. This helped build connections with other accounts, drive cross-engagement and put Flash in front of more people on Twitter. Over time, this helped double our engagement on X.

03 · RESULTS

Flash’s X Analytics for August 2025, our first full month running the account, with a two-week window from inside it.

CHANGE VS PREVIOUS PERIOD · AUG 1–31, 2025
Replies
+146%
Profile visits
+99%
Impressions
+96%
Likes, reposts, bookmarks
+54–67%
New follows
+26%
Engagement rate
−6.2%
ABSOLUTEAUG 1–31AUG 3–15
Impressions 373.4K 187.4K
New follows 767 325
Engagement rate 4.7% 4.2%
WHAT THE NUMBERS SHOW
  • Impressions almost doubled (+96%) and profile visits went up 99%, so a lot more people were seeing Flash and checking out the profile.
  • Replies grew the most (+146%), which lines up with the proactive reply strategy.
  • Engagement rate dipped a little (4.7%, -6.2%) because impressions grew faster than interactions. Likes, reposts and bookmarks were still up 54 to 67%.
Source: X Analytics for the Flash account.
04 · TAKEAWAYS
  1. 01 Memes work better when tied to a narrative. Standalone humorous posts can grab attention, but connecting them to announcements, trending topics or updates gives people a reason to engage.
  2. 02 Make complex ideas easier to understand. The futarchy meme video showed how familiar meme and short-form video formats can help explain new concepts to users who might not engage with a traditional announcement.
  3. 03 Engagement goes beyond posting. Actively replying to other accounts and joining conversations across Twitter helped Flash reach people beyond its own audience.
NEXT CASE STUDY · Hyacinth Pipeline and audience, built from zero. →
← All case studies Hyacinth logoHyacinth

Pipeline and audience, built from zero.

COMPANY
Hyacinth, a blockchain security firm
ROLE
GTM and business development
AUDIENCE
Developers, founders and teams looking for smart contract audits
FORMAT
Educational threads
$486K closed revenue from net-new pipeline
~164 founder-level conversations
2,500+ followers on X, grown organically
01 · CHALLENGE

Security firms grow on partnership announcements, but Hyacinth needed people paying attention before it could land the partnerships.

As a security firm, Hyacinth needed to reach developers, founders, and teams looking for smart contract audits. X was an important channel for getting in front of potential clients and generating inbound enquiries.

However, there was a chicken and egg problem. Security firms often received a significant share of their engagement from partnership announcements, but as a newer account, Hyacinth needed an audience to attract partnerships in the first place. Relying on partnership posts alone wasn’t a sustainable way to build an audience or consistently reach potential clients.

02 · WHAT WE DID

To address this, we focused on educational content that could attract attention independently of partnerships. At the time, threads were generating more engagement than blogs on X, so we prioritised thread-based content around:

  • Curated security resources
  • Common vulnerabilities
  • Learning roadmaps for aspiring auditors and developers

The idea was to give developers and potential clients a reason to discover and engage with Hyacinth for its security expertise, building reach and credibility beyond partnership announcements.

Led GTM efforts across early-stage ecosystems (Monad, MegaETH, Sonic, Berachain), landing Movement Labs’ security subsidy partnership.

Built net-new pipeline from zero, converting over $486K in closed revenue to date. Ran outbound to 1,200+ prospects, engaging ~967 accounts and multi-threading upward from growth teams to ~164 founder-level conversations, alongside ~48 in-person 1:1 meetings at conferences across APAC.

Built accounts infrastructure from scratch, including HubSpot CRM, pipeline transparency processes, and a key account prioritisation system run with SDR support, which improved retention & data accuracy.

Owned multiple functions beyond sales, from marketing operations to design and social content, growing the company’s X presence to 2,500+ followers organically with 500K+ impressions. Turned what clients raised on calls into product specifications the team actually shipped.

03 · RESULTS
NET-NEW PIPELINE, FIRST TOUCH TO CLOSED REVENUE
Prospects reached through outbound 1,200+
Accounts engaged ~967
Founder-level conversations ~164
In-person 1:1 meetings at APAC conferences ~48
Closed revenue to date $486K
ORGANIC GROWTH ON X
2,500+followers, grown organically
500K+impressions
NEXT CASE STUDY · Code4rena Data-driven sales for a crowded audit market. →